Journalist Who Broke Epstein Saga Tracked By DOJ?

WHAY WAS THE DOJ TRACKING THE JOURNALIST WHO LITERALLY BROKE THE EPSTEING SAGA?

I must say that I’ve only had a general understanding of the reporting some amazing people did covering Jeffrey Epstein nearly 20 years ago. But in particular, journalist Julie K. Brown literally spent years investigating Epstein for the Miami Herald. In 2018, her 2018 Perversion of Justice series introduced us to 80 of his victims and finally shined the light on the sweetheart deal that allowed Epstein to walk free in 2008. Her series was arguably responsible for federal prosecutors finally arresting him again in 2019. So it begs the question: why has she been tracked by the DOJ? She literally broke the story on what’s become the Epstein saga. Brown is asking this question, herself.

Read More:

THE DOJ TRACKS CRIMINALS, CRIMINAL GROUPS, FUGITIVES, TERRORISTS, AND…. JOURNALISTS?

To be fair, the DOJ tracks a lot of people. Suspected criminals, criminal groups, terrorists, human traffickers, etc. But the DOJ isn’t supposed to track journalists like Julie K. Brown, aside from the fact that her work on Epstein won her two Polk Awards and Time even listed her on its 100 Most Influential list. So why was the DOJ tracking her? There clearly is no good answer. Especially considering how Brown herself discovered she was under surveillance from the documents released (by the DOJ) via the Epstein Transparency Act. That’s right, Brown being tracked by the DOJ was a part of the Epstein files.

FBI Sources: Epstein Files Are Much, Much Worse For Trump

NO ANSWERS FROM THE DOJ MAKES YOU WONDER WHO THE DOJ REALLY WORKS FOR

It’s troubling, to say the least. It almost (almost meaning definitely) makes you think that it’s not all that unusual for the government to spy, surveil and track any journalist who embarrasses them like Brown did. Then you almost (definitely) have to think that the DOJ is watching journalists like Brown so they know who they speak with, where they are and what they speak about in order to prevent any further embarrassments. But then you definitely (definitely) have to wonder if it’s safe to assume that the DOJ (in Brown’s instance) was monitoring her on behalf of a certain Executive, the still-uncharged Epstein co-conspirators, or anyone else?