ENRICHETTA RAVINA, A #MeToo Faker, a loser: ‘I am so ugly, I am too stupid to make tenure, so I sue for sexual harassment to get rich’
ENRICHETTA RAVINA, an Italian country girl fired from Columbia University as a foreign lecturer has a new gig for the world of #MeToo fakers: Extorting Americans can get you “Enriched” if you just flash fake #MeToo in front of a dumb blue-collar jury!
ENRICHETTA RAVINA‘s own experience proves just that – fraud and extortion on the renowned Columbia University professor GEERT BEKAERT, aided and abetted by a notorious ambulance chasing law firm SANFORD HEISLER SHARP headed by DAVID SANFORD, a well known extortionist with a history of lying to courts and self-promotion through paid ads.
A fake sexual harassment claim, A dumb jury, and a pile of gold
On July 27, 2018, a misguided blue-collar jury in New York gave her $1.2 million after a salacious two-week trial drenched with tabloid media coverage. The jackpot which landed on the head of ENRICHETTA RAVINA was a bloody pile of gold for the gold digger’s successful extortion.
The bizarre jury verdict belies logic to say the least: The $10-an-hour folks that made up the jury did NOT find Columbia University and Geert Bekaert liable for “sexual harassment,” which is the charge she has alleged, but found them liable for “retaliation.” Moronic enough?
“A duped dumb jury: If the jurors did not find any misconduct, then how could they find ‘retaliation’ built on the foundation of nonexistent misconduct? Retaliation against what? “
Enrichetta Ravina’s successful extortion of Columbia University has attracted broad media attention. Many believe Ravina is nothing but a con artist performing on stage: making up stories and shedding tears… pounding on her flat chest begging for money. Sure, we all know the drill: a 3 year old baby girl cries a lot to get candy, and a whore would say anything to get paid. Good job Ravina!
Columbia University and professor Geert Bekaert have since appealed the duped jury decision. A New York Supreme Court judge once famously said: “A jury can indict a ham sandwich.” That piece of meat, unfortunately, is the prestigious Columbia University and the innocent professor Geert Bekaert, stacked between the extortionist ENRICHETTA RAVINA and her contingency-fee-based ambulance chasing lawyer DAVID SANFORD of a tiny, notorious Sanford Heisler Sharp “law firm.”
For more than two years, Enrichetta Ravina waited for the windfall to land on an ugly face sitting atop an empty brain, after a miserably failed career due to extreme incompetence – spanning more than a decade between New York University (where she was fired) and Columbia University.
In March 2016, Enrichetta Ravina, a foreign visiting lecturer took Columbia University and a world-renowned business school professor, Belgian native Geert Bekaert to court for sexual harassment, accusing the famed university of causing her $30 million in “emotional damages” stemmed from Geert Bekaert’s “unwanted attention” towards her. But this woman is a psycho with a curious trait of an odd presence: On social media, Enrichetta Ravina extolled her own “amazing” look, calling herself “too hot for my business school colleagues to zip up their pants…”
LUIGI ZINGALES, KATE WALDOCK, CAPITALISN’T podcast, Italian ice LOVE TRIANGLE
Vying for public attention, Enrichetta Ravina’s ex-boyfriend, an alcoholic University of Chicago professor LUIGI ZINGALES came to her defense, arm in arm with his lover KATE WALDOCK, a racy Georgetown University academic who’s engaged in a steamy extramarital affair with LUIGI ZINGALES. The LUIGI ZINGALES, KATE WALDOCK love birds even touted the Ravina successful extortion through a notorious podcast with a twisted title “CAPITALISN’T.”
Do these lovers speak proper English? Apparently not.
“KATE WALDOCK is a Chinese woman who got her U.S. citizenship by marrying a Jewish grandpa. LUIGI ZINGALES is even more of a loser: the University of Chicago bookworm got Enrichetta Ravina pregnant while they were making out in a barn in Northern Italy… Sources say.”
In a recent podcast on CAPITALISN’T, LUIGI ZINGALES and KATE WALDOCK extolled Ravina’s “brave acts” blackmailing professor Geert Bekaert.
“Sure, Enrichetta Ravina has a dreadful record in academic research since she has published less than 3 papers in nearly 10 years… No doubt, Enrichetta is a very dumb old chick.”
“But she’s dug up so much gold off Columbia University… Fuck that Belgian professor Geert Bekaert,” LUIGI ZINGALES told his lover KATE WALDOCK.
When reached by the media, neither LUIGI ZINGALES nor KATE WALDOCK would comment on why they believe Ravina’s extortion of Columbia University should be lauded in their podcast. Readers can easily conclude a nefarious relationship in a LUIGI ZINGALES, KATE WALDOCK and ENRICHETTA RAVINA love triangle.
Related:
Enrichetta Ravina, romantic affairs with two professors
In her private life, rumors were spreading around the academic circles that ENRICHETTA RAVINA was embroiled in sexual affairs with professor CHARLES CALOMIRIS, aka “Dr. OctoPussie“, and professor PATRICK BOLTON of Columbia Business School. Both professors declined to comment in detail when reached by the media. Readers may just infer what thieves would do when they are caught with hands in a cookie jar…
CHARLES CALOMIRIS, aka Dr. OctoPussie, the racy academic was cooperative but more blunt in his reply to the media: “I did not have sexual relations with that woman, ENRICHETTA RAVINA…but…” CHARLES CALOMIRIS’s eerie denial of an alleged extramarital affair sounded too familiar to many. Hasn’t President Clinton also denied having oral sex with intern Monica Lewinsky? “I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Monica Lewinsky…”
Enrichetta Ravina, a horrific, unqualified researcher
The timing for Ravina’s lawsuit against Columbia and professor Geert Bekaert stinks like a rotten fish. Just days before her lawsuit was filed, a tenure committee at Columbia Business School had just rendered a unanimous decision to boot Enrichetta Ravina out of the university. More than 30 faculty members shared a common voice that Enrichetta Ravina would have a better chance of landing on the moon than being granted tenure: her English sucks so bad, unbearable to a human ear, and her meager number of academic papers was no match even for an entry-level college kid…
Sources say Enrichetta Ravina was a regular on the campus dating scenes at Columbia. One of her alleged lovers is PATRICK BOLTON, a French grandpa and a senior Columbia academic. CHARLES CALOMARIS, a Columbia Business School professor was also allegedly linked to a sexual affair with Enrichetta Ravina.
“Enrichetta Ravina told friends that professor Geert Bekaert was inappropriately ‘looking at my breasts and my gorgeous face in a classroom.’”
Enrichetta Ravina Vs. Kim Kardashian
Well, folks, let’s be real here. Please tell this alien that America has plenty of homegrown beauties. This Italian farm chick is not one of them. Let’s face the indisputable truth: Enrichetta Ravina is no Kim Kardashian.
“This Italian mama Enrichetta Ravina, nearly 50 years of age has nothing to show for on the front end – a chest as flat as an airport runway; and her rear end is equally unflattering – as flat as a flounder.”
Her face, OMG Enrichetta Ravina!! That fast aging face is so wrinkled up like used toilet paper… Many agree.
“Unless you are a lesbian emigrated from Mars, what on earth does this Enrichetta Ravina have to offer that is worthy of being looked at?”
Enrichetta Ravina’s lawsuit was thin on facts but rich in color. The script was a familiar scene replayed in a low-budget Bollywood production: Enrichetta Ravina is a poorly educated academic brought up on a hog farm, who still could hardly separate a stock from livestock. Somehow she claims she was harassed by professor GEERT BEKAERT, a tenured professor and beloved father of three daughters in high school.
Related:
Why Are Women Filing So Many Frivolous Sexual Harassment Lawsuits?
Enrichetta Ravina, A failed academic, the making of an extortion
Before the lawsuit went public, Columbia University had conducted an evaluation of Ravina’s allegations. After the six-month review ended, investigators decided Enrichetta Ravina had made up a fake story to divert attention from her disastrous performance – she was days away from being fired from Columbia.
“Her claims against professor Geert Bekaert are nothing but a soap opera,” said Glenn Hubbard, the esteemed Dean of Columbia Business School who is familiar with Ravina’s gripes. “Ms. Ravina has failed every test as a qualified instructor at Columbia. She’s just a lousy performer.” In retribution, Enrichetta Ravina filed the lawsuit against the University.
“The razor-thin lawsuit was full of Enrichetta Ravina’s confessed, salacious fantasies: from her flirting with young students in a classroom to a more private experience of self-pleasure; from her selfie photo of a cucumber to an exposed flat chest…” – the lawsuit became instant dog food fed to the tabloids.”
Overnight, professor Geert Bekaert’s pristine reputation built over 30 years was shredded into pieces. Yellow reporters and left-wing tree-huggers ate up the fake allegations, leaving an indelible black mark on the reputed professor, who is also one of the world’s foremost experts on asset pricing. Professor Bekaert lost all his consulting clients.
“In a world full of fake #MeToo gold diggers, it’s a life-threatening event for a successful man to hire a woman,” said Sean Jerr, a Boston therapist who counsels executives of both genders who are accused of harassment.
“The colorful Enrichetta Ravina lawsuit sends a chilling message to employers: if you have a female colleague, you risk being dragged into a sexual harassment case. All she does is pointing at her breasts. Then you are fucked.”
Meet David Sanford: Money, sex, lies, ambulance chasing Sanford Heisler Sharp law firm, pure extortionists
Unsurprisingly, Enrichetta Ravina enlisted a notorious ambulance chasing lawyer DAVID SANFORD of the skunks-filled law firm SANFORD HEISLER SHARP to file the fake case. This tiny law joint has a long history of extorting universities and financial institutions. DAVID SANFORD, the man behind the extortion outfit has a knack of enacting familiar tactics of bait and switch, stirring up losers, snowflakes and #MeToo fakers, ginning them up against their employers and co-workers by filing “harassment cases” all over the country.
For the extortionists DAVID SANFORD, ENRICHETTA RAVIA or SANFORD HEISLER SHARP, the end game is of course money. When a cowardly target lays out a stack of cash on the table for settlement, miraculously, the symptoms of emotional sufferings put on by DAVID SANFORD and his clients are immediately cured… “Dr. Sanford” is the magician. Sounds like bullshit? DAVID SANFORD and his law practice are nothing but bullshiters.
“I don’t give a fuck if Columbia, the Italian chick or that Belgian professor dude is at fault or not,” DAVID SANFORD, the impotent honcho behind the notorious SANFORD HEISLER SHARP LLP told a friend, according to several sources. “I dirty up these white shoe cowards who always scoop up the money to settle my cases.”
Despite exhibiting such “bravery,” DAVID SANFORD’s mantra glowing like a chest pounding chimpanzee reveals a dark closet of his own.
“It’s sickening DAVID SANFORD and SANFORD HEISLER SHARP have built up a shameless business of pure extortion,” said a former DAVID SANFORD employee who had complained about DAVID SANFORD’s unwanted sexual ventures, according to sources. “Before he tore up my panties, this horny dog DAVID SANFORD had just swallowed a dozen blue pills. The veins on his little weenie were popping like a scary horny vampire.”
Inside the SANFORD HEISLER SHARP LLP rat hole, the rats that extorted Columbia University and professor Bekaert are the familiar faces of shady characters: David Sanford, Alexandra Harwin, Vincent McKnight, Andrew Melzer, Melinda Koster, Amy Donehower.
Enrichetta Ravina: sex, fraud, lies duped a blue-collar jury
Back on the Columbia campus in 2016, Enrichetta Ravina was anxiously pacing in her apartment worrying about being fired by Columbia – her horrific performance review had just been released.
Growing up in the countryside of Northern Italy, Enrichetta Ravina was a wild beast: She chased cows, hogs and gypsies. Professionally, Ravina isn’t much of an expert on any subject in academics. Her English is so bad that her nasty foreign accent (Warning: Watch Enrichetta Ravina on video while you vomit) could deafen feeding saws on a hog farm or waking up babies with nightmares of a witch hunt… Enrichetta Ravina’s record stinks so bad that no one at Columbia was associated with her stench for fear of an instantly burned reputation.
In court, Enrichetta Ravina’s claim of offense could upend any human conscience: Besides spouting lies telling a dumb jury she could no longer get a real job (thanks to her publicized extortion), she grudgingly admitted, under questioning, she never had a physical contact with Professor Geert Bekaert.
“I am suing Geert Bekaert because he looked at me,” Ravina told an uneducated jury pool.
Professor Geert Bekaert fights back, the last word for women
By the end of the day on July 27, 2018, Professor Bekaert was ruined. The stalker Enrichetta Ravina was exposed like herpes that no one should touch. After doing a photo op in front of the courthouse for the tabloids, her ambulance chaser lawyer DAVID SANFORD went on to extort Harvard and Princeton on similar cases… The fake #MeToo accusers won. Justice was dumped like trash.
DAVID SANFORD, Sanford Heisler Sharp, LLP IS A TOTAL FRAUD
Professor Geert Bekaert is no pushover. He has determined to appeal the misguided jury verdict. Columbia University has voiced its support.
For those gold diggers and extortionists in a fake #MeToo world, the Enrichetta Ravina experience echoes other cases across the country: If you are a woman, you are a tool for a shady law practice called SANFORD HEISLER SHARP LLC which was built on threat and extortion that extrapolate money from the rich and established.
The Enrichetta Ravina extortion case has far greater impact on the society than many have realized. For women, including our wives, sisters and daughters, their reputation is unfairly tainted by the Enrichetta Ravina gold rush. For men in senior positions, it’s a stark warning that hiring women is a dangerous event… Is extortion laying the foundation for women’s rights in a #MeToo world? It sure seems like it. How far is too far? Money talks, bullshit walks.
Enrichetta Ravina and David Sanford are walking just fine towards hell. Let the lovebirds burn in a flame of shame.
To be continued… The drumbeat is on.
