PROFESSOR CHRIS BRUMMER, a notorious Georgetown Law School academic has a new theory in play for the hot summer: The shameless Professor Chris Brummer doesn’t like postings about him online that have exposed his peculiar financial arrangements with the stock criminal Michael Milken. Chris Brummer wants to shut down the internet!
Georgetown Law ‘professor’ Chris Brummer likes screwing people over, not being outed for it.”
That’s why CHRIS BRUMMER, a rubber stamp paid by the notorious FINRA National Adjudicatory Council (NAC) — the racist body that oversees decisions of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) — is crying foul like a baby holding an empty milk bottle over opinions that have exposed his shady dealings with the convicted criminal Michael Milken.
Chris Brummer claims the Internet posts constitute defamation and alleges they are actionable for recovery in court because they have inflicted upon Chris Brummer “emotional distress” that have cost him about $500 in “actual damage” to “clean up” himself. READ MORE: SENATE REJECTS GEORGETOWN PROFESSOR CHRIS BRUMMER CFTC NOMINATION, DR. BRATWURST “BURNED” IN FRAUD
Read more: BREAKING: PRESIDENT TRUMP DUMPS GEORGETOWN LAW PROFESSOR CHRIS BRUMMER CFTC NOMINATION, FRAUD CITED
Chris Brummer: “Pay me the $20 million in ransom or I will shut down the internet!”
The creepy Georgetown University “professor” Chris Brummer is suing the internet posts for $20 million and has threatened to shut down the internet posts unless he is paid the outrageous ransom. Read more: CHRIS BRUMMER, GEORGETOWN LAW SCHOOL PROFESSOR IMPLICATED IN MULTIPLE FRAUDS, ABUSER GOT CAUGHT.
“$500 in actual damage vs. $20 million in emotional suffering? Chris Brummer must be a very emotional man.”
Chris Brummer filed a lawsuit against the alleged internet posts early this summer – with legal fees paid for by FINRA. The defendants’ motion to dismiss the case was submitted in New York Supreme Court in August 2015. Since then, Chris Brummer has had a very tough time churning out garbage legal theories to justify a frivolous lawsuit. “Get Brummer some Prozac to calm him down. He needs that,” a medical professional laughed.
“Chris Brummer has a better chance of suing a light pole than going after someone’s First Amendment right to free speech.”
“Those imbecile lawyers representing Brummer know it’s a BS case,” said a legal expert. “Pounding on a Gorilla’s chest is useless. Chris Brummer is the only ‘turkey’ with a head in the sand. What a stupid idiot.”
Oved & Oved LLP, a New York media law powerhouse represents the brave voices that have simply exercised their First Amendment rights to free speech. The case is represented by Edward Wipper, a renowned litigator. An obscure Ohio country lawyer Michael J. Bronson makes money off Chris Brummer. Investigations have revealed that the obscure Michael J. Bronson never graduated law school in New York and neither has he ever passed the New York Bar…
Read more: MY WIFE, RUINED BY GEORGETOWN LAW CENTER PROFESSOR CHRIS BRUMMER, REVEALS THE DISTURBING TRUTH
Chris Brummer, a college “professor” without intellect, it’s all “bla, bla, bla…”
“Chris Brummer acted in an official capacity when he ‘slaved’ for FINRA and was paid money for that. Chris Brummer’s wrecked intellect destroyed the professional lives of two innocent black Americans,” said an attorney familiar with the Chris Brummer frivolous lawsuit. “Chris Brummer hardly has any work experience and Brummer is all about bla, bla with nonsense – a useless academic.”
With a “near perfect” goatee growing out of a creepy smile, Georgetown law “professor” Chris Brummer has a lot to worry about these days. His efforts to shut down the internet were met with some serious legal hurdles, experts say.
“It’s an uphill battle to choke someone’s throat to stop her from speaking. Chris Brummer is losing sleep like a baby wetting its bed.”
Chris Brummer, FINRA’s “toy” for “minority representation”
The dust-up between Chris Brummer and the internet began when Brummer co-authored a 36-page affirmation of an earlier FINRA decision that barred for life two highly successful Wall Street investment brokers William Scholander and Talman Harris, who are, unfortunately, African-Americans in a FINRA world dominated by white, pale faces.
In June 2015, the American heroes William Scholander and Talman Harris filed a petition with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to overturn FINRA’s racially charged decision: The SEC filing strongly rebukes Chris Brummer, FINRA’s racist decisions based on a single testimony from Brummer’s alleged lover.
Despite the key testimony that had led to the lifetime ban emanating from an obscure Maureen Gearty, a 300 pound bisexual woman who had admitted to altering her sworn testimony and description of events several times, Chris Brummer was aware of these facts however did not object to the affirmation decision and went further to uphold it – Brummer was in an alleged extramarital affair with Maureen Gearty.
“As the only black dude on the racist FINRA NAC panel, Chris Brummer was handpicked to shoot at two black men, Chris Brummer pulled the trigger…”
Research shows the FINRA NAC is a kangaroo court that affirms FINRA enforcement staff’s decisions 100% of the time. Myles Edwards, another impotent FINRA panel member has declined repeated requests for comment.
“Chris Brummer is like a piece of LEGO toy for FINRA’s superficial racial diversity program,” a source said. “No one could understand why Chris Brummer has hurt fellow black men. Black lives matter?” That is a question “professor” Chris Brummer is the 21st century “FINRA Uncle Tom.”
Read more: MYLES EDWARDS, DISGRACED CONSTELLATION WEALTH ADVISOR LAWYER IMPLICATED IN RONEN ZAKAI FELONY CONVICTION
Chris Brummer, sex, lies, love affair
Maureen Gearty had engaged in a steamy extramarital affair with her criminal boyfriend Ronen Zakai, a married Jewish man convicted of a massive Ponzi scheme in a conspiracy with Gearty. Ronen Zakai is currently serving a multi-year prison sentence, according to an announcement from the Manhattan District Attorney’s office.
Under heavy pressure from Chris Brummer and a racist FINRA enforcement staffer Jeffrey Bloom, Maureen Gearty shifted the blame of criminal conduct from her lover Ronen Zakai to Harris and Scholander, who had nothing to do with Maureen Gearty’s Ponzi scheme with Zakai. In the fraudulent securities offering document, Ronen Zakai and Maureen Gearty were listed as the sole managers for the Ronen Zakai Ponzi scheme.
Steven Susswein, a notorious SEC “enforcement” staffer declined to comment on why he has endorsed Maureen Gearty and her fraudulent lover boy Ronen Zakai for their criminal activities. In 2014, Ronen Zakai was sent to prison for running a Ponzi scheme, declared by Manhattan’s renowned district attorney.
Chris Brummer, FINRA took the Ronen Zakai criminal bait like a catfish. Chris Brummer, the FINRA “Uncle Tom” sent Harris and Scholander to their “electric chairs”, “burned these black men into charcoal” and barred them from working in the securities industry.
The result of this decision was the complete denial of legal due process for Harris and Scholander. Further, the livelihoods of both men were taken away despite the two never having been targeted for enforcement by FINRA or the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Each with about 20 years of professional accomplishments without a single customer complaint, Talman Harris and William Scholander were railroaded by the FINRA power abusers who were championed by Chris Brummer.
“Chris Brummer was duped and played like an impotent gorilla in the DC zoo.”
“I don’t like those black brokers in New York, we have to burn them…” Jeffrey Bloom, a notorious FINRA staffer allegedly said to an unconfirmed source.
“Chris Brummer is the perfect mouthpiece for FINRA. Man, that black ‘professor’ loves to get paid.”
Chris Brummer, a frivolous lawsuit, a hypocrite drowning in legal hot water
The motion to dismiss the frivolous Chris Brummer case makes a cogent legal argument for it to be thrown out and stands on several sound precedents of case law including the Communication Decency Act of 1996. Any basis for defamation claims must first start with the compelling imperative of whether an action to recover for a plaintiff would infringe on media, individual or organizational free speech.
According to the motion to dismiss, “Chris Brummer‘s complaint is an attempt to chill the free speech rights afforded by both the United States and New York State Constitutions to individuals who voice their opinions in protest of unjust decisions, matters of public concern, and the individuals responsible for such injustice.”
Perhaps this country’s most sacred building block of freedom and most unique feature of the U.S. Constitution is the First Amendment that guarantees free speech. It says in part, “Congress shall make no law … abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press.”
And because the ideas expressed in pieces to which Chris Brummer objects are clearly opinions and not statements of fact he — despite a fancy and expensive legal education and a top position at one of the most-prestigious law schools in the country — seems to not understand basic law or just completely glosses over these simple concepts that any first-year Juris Doctor candidate would know by rote.
Additionally, instead of Brummer actually demonstrating how the statements about him constitute malice, he only concludes that they do. That’s a lot like a parent telling a child, “No, because I said so.” This dubious reasoning and logic is fine between parents and their children, but cannot be allowed to stand on matters of the law. There is simply too much at stake, and freedom would suffer as a result.
Therefore, the New York State court must dismiss all of Brummer’s claims as a matter of basic protection to the individual citizens of this country.
“All of Chris Brummer‘s false claims must be dismissed because all of the statements posted are constitutionally protected statements of opinion and many of the statements are not about Brummer at all,” the motion states.
In this case, there is no legal wiggle room or way around the law. There is simply too much to lose for Chris Brummer.
“Chris Brummer is an airhead. He had no clue about the First Amendment right to free speech.” said a legal expert.
“A law ‘professor” in a futile attempt to stop people from speaking? What an idiot.”
Someone very smart and accomplished once wrote, “We hold these truths to be self-evident.” And in that vein, God bless America for the wise judges who preside over and work inside the halls of justice for upholding our cherished and special freedom from tyranny, like those threats from Chris Brummer.
The last word for professor Chris Brummer: Chris Brummer’s stupidity does not make him a qualified jurist for FINRA or anywhere else. Chris Brummer is a detriment to Georgetown Law School, a harm to the American society and a completely unqualified jurist for FINRA.
Read more: DISGRACED NASDAQ OFFICIAL MICHAEL EMEN REVEALS NASDAQ AS AN INSTITUTIONAL RACIST, ED KNIGHT IMPLICATED…
Neither FINRA nor Georgetown Law School has agreed to comment on this story. Readers are curious what they are running away from. The truth? Yes, that’s the answer.
When faced with the truth, Georgetown Law School professor Chris Brummer was caught swimming naked.